The Power of Detail. Rembrandt Re-Confirmed

Rembrandt Today Educational Project (C)

In early March 2026, the leading Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam announced major news in the arts world. After two years of meticulous research using the newest techniques and equipment, the museum was able to confirm Rembrandt’s authorship of the impressive Vision of Zacharias in the Temple work. 

There is a certain  art detective with regard to this mid-size painting, as it is the case with many of Rembrandt’s works. Due to the fact that the work, painted over an oak two-part panel , was largely in the private hands, it had been publicly exhibited only thrice for all 383 years of its existence, in 1898 in Amsterdam at the Stedlija Museum, followed by Fred Muller art dealers show in 1906, and public exhibition  in Paris in 1911. Some time later it became part of the Royal collection in the Netherlands, and specifically the personal collection of Wilhelmina, the Dutch legendary monarch. Such history of the work has set the fact that it was seen publicly the last time a bit over a century. 

Rembrandt van Rijn. Vision of Zacharias in the Temple. Oil on oak panel. 1633. Courtesy: Rijksmuseum (C).

As the art historians and art connoisseurs aware of, the authenticity of Rembrandt’s oeuvre is taken extremely seriously and rigorously in the Netherland, with  existence and work of a special commission, an experts panel which is the most authoritative body, traditionally, in the cases of authentications. 

As it happened, in 1960, the work in question, Vision of Zacharias in the Temple, was removed from the existing Rembrandt’s  Catalogue Raisonne and re-attributed as the work of the Rembrandt School.

Being in the possession of a European private art collector who prefers anonymity, the work was continuing its hidden life away from the public eye. 

A couple of years ago, the current owner decided to ask a very able conservators at the Rijksmuseum to have a closer look at the work – with the agreement for a long-term loan to the prolific museum. During their most modern research, the Rijksmuseum team was able to prove several key-facts supporting the Rembrandt’s authorship of the work, including the way of signing the work – which he did on the wet paint, thus proving his authorship decisively, additionally to several other key-things. 

Interestingly, the research was able to find and state not only the age of the oak panel which Rembrandt used for the work, but also the place where the oak was growing – this is 383 years ago. The place turned out to be Lithuania. 

With the ability to be so precise on the details of oak panels used for the painting, the conservators team of the Rijksmuseum was also able to be more precise on the dating of the work. 

Previously, given the details which were known to the French art dealer Albert Lehmann from whom the work was acquired to the Queen Wilhelmina collection, the work was catalogised in the Dutch Royal collection as dated approximately 1631 or 1932. 

Now, with full assuredness, the Rijksmuseum’s researchers identified the year when Rembrandt painted his Zaharias as 1633. 

Coming almost four hundred years back, we can see a young, 27-year Rembrandt who has recently, just a couple of years back,  moved to Amsterdam from his native Leiden, and who was working fiercely trying to establish his reputation and business in the Dutch capital.  For that very reason, Rembrandt was busy largely with portraits in that period of his life. 

So, even not a large one, 56 x 48 cm, work on the Biblical topic is not the thing that comes to mind of Rembrandt’s experts for that period of his life and work. The painting depicts the episode in which elderly Zacharias is told in a vision that despite their both old age, he and his wife will become the parents of John the Baptist. The vision has amazed Zacharias deeply. 

Rembrandt van Rijn. Vision of Zacharias in the temple. 1633. Fragment.

From this point of view, the re-discovery of this work is yet more significant. 

In the work itself, the composition is bold and daring for a 27-year old painter who had become noticed by the art connoisseurs of his time just three years ago, when he was 24. With a lot of air surrounding the figure of Zacharias, and a masterly bringing the table in the low corner, with an emphatically  large manuscript almost suspended in the air being supported by Zacharias hands only, this is amazingly modern. 

Rembrandt van Rijn. Vision of Zacharias in the temple. 1633. Fragment.

The details are very expressive and masterly done as well, especially the silver vase, and that large manuscript which is done by young Rembrandt with such mastership that one can almost feel its weight. How did he do it? When we have no answer to this natural question and emotions behind it, it means that this is an art, an Art with a capital A in question. 

Rembrandt van Rijn. Vision of Zacharias in the temple. 1633. Fragment.

But the most amazing element of this rare in all senses painting is Zacharia’s hands. They are amazing. Fine, live, living. With elements like that in the mid-size artwork painted on an oak panel almost 400 years ago, there is a real dialogue between its master and his time and us today, looking at his work with gratitude and amazement. 

Fortunately, after a century of obscurity, from now on, this newly re-attributed masterpiece of young Rembrandt will be on display at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. A great work by the Rijksmuseum researchers, and such a joy for all those who feel as attached at many levels to that incredible master who has become the source of profession and vision for generations. 

March 2026 © IR  

————

The Lock of Love: From Chagall to Rembrandt and Back

Rembrandt Influence in Chagall Art

Essay 

Inna Rogatchi (C). The Lock of Love collage. Chagall Heritage Today project 2025.

Inna Rogatchi (C). The Lock of Love. Chagall Heritage Today project. (C). 2024-2025.

There is an interesting and telling gesture and declaration of love and admiration, and the conscious sign of choosing his artistic path being led by the highest possible professional standard, the one by Rembrandt, by 27-year Marc Chagall in one of his most vivid portraits created in 1914.

1914 is one of the most decisive years for Chagall, reflecting the world which never was the same after the Great War started in that year. By then, Chagall had been in Paris for three years already. And being in Paris for young enough Chagall, who was 24 on his arrival there, meant to be in Louvre where his soul was developing and blossoming, absorbing the wealth of the world and civilization art in a dizzy indulgence.

Rembrandt was the world, the cosmos and everything for Chagall from the moment he saw the works of that titan, the titan of art of all times. Rembrandt has become a starting point, metaphorically, for Marc Chagall in his vision of art, and having such a solid ground in very visioning of art in general, the level of Chagall’s own art always was steady, and it was always high. The top. Never faltering, under any circumstances, till the very end of his very long, almost a century-long life. This is not the case for many other artists.

With all his ostensibly easiness of subject-matters and related images, which led to some existing , grossly wrong attributions of the Chagall’s art to the school of naive art, he is a superb master of a highest order and craft who was always led , consciously and by his own choice of a top demand and strive, by the utmost best ones, Rembrandt in the visual art, and Mozart and Bach in music.

When you see the world and your profession through the prism of a highest demand, your own effort brings the corresponding result. That young Chagall realized early on. Three years in Paris , this was largely in Louvre, in his mid-20s, amid fierce work brought the result, with his first gallery contract in Paris, and yet more importantly, especially for him feeling lonely and under-appreciated, with his first solo exhibition in Berlin. Chagall was ecstatic about that first personal exhibition and not anywhere but Berlin, thriving, magnetic and bubbling with a non-stop public appetite for art.

Rembrandt’s effect on Marc Chagall was giant, and because of its depth and continuation, Chagall evolved into painting a huge number of self-portraits, following the pattern set by Rembrandt, the most prolific author of his time. The number of confirmed self-portraits by Rembrandt in all techniques, oil, drawing and etching comes to one hundred. The number of Chagall’s self-portraits is several time more, but the pattern of a perpetual artistic self- search and self-expression via the most familiar to an artist subject, himself, was set for Marc Chagall by his deep admiration, and more, his detailed understanding of Rembrandt, and his certain partial self-identification with the great master, his principal teacher, as goes.

In 1914, 27-year Chagall paints his charming, vivid, expressive and quite masterly Self-Portrait in Front of the House in unusual for his self-portraits official attire, but with a joking and pointing color of the artist’s trousers, that bright and outpouring blue which he adopted as his color for life. His jacket is rich brown, with enlightened spots so familiar to many of us from another master, the one of the 17th century, whose brown has imprinted in our collective retina the same deep, as Chagall’s blue did.

Rembrandt van Rijn (C). Self-Portrait with a Gorget. Oil on oak panel. 38,2 x 31 cm. 1629. Germanisches Nationalmuseum. Nuremberg. Germany. Rembrandt Project – with kind permission.

It is not without reason that Chagall believed that ‘blue for me is the same that brown for Rembrandt’, and in the making his jacket not just brown, but decisively and declaratively Rembrandt-like brown, Chagall who, with his first gallery contract signed in Paris and his first big and serious solo exhibition in Berlin, had been just accepted in the club of artist-masters, as he understood it, with a proper reasoning, was referring in his charming and special self-portrait to his teachers of teachers, who lived and worked three hundreds years before him. And not only the jacket.

Marc Chagall (C). Self-Portrait in Front of the House. Oil on cardboard mounted on canvas. 50,7×38 cm. 1914. Private collection (C) ADAGP, Paris. With kind permission.

In the Chagall’s self-portrait in question, we see his left-side lock as a longer one. What does it tell us? It does tell those who know Rembrandt well enough, to remember about his asymmetrical left lock in his second oil-painted self-portrait of 1629 known as Self-Portrait with Gorget, or Self-Portrait With Breastplate.

Lovelock as that asymmetrical lock of hair was known from the 16th century, came from France, and was highly popular there. Not so was the case in the Netherlands of the 17th century, it was a sign of teasing and demonstration of emphasized, publicly demonstrated independence by some young men there. A bit of an intentional over-doing. And young Rembrandt who was 23 at the time of painting his second oil self-portrait, took care to show his lovelock the same expressively as his famous breastplate, the gorget. Or actually he made it famous by portraying it on a small oak panel.

Two hundred and eighty five years later, 27-young Marc Chagall in the year of his first serious exhibition in one of the thriving world’s capital, painted on cardboard his homage to his guiding star , of a size which is a bit larger than the Rembrandt’s self-portrait painted by him at 23 almost three hundred years earlier.

It is quite an artistic dialogue, to me. Powerful, engaged, masterly, and , most importantly, full of subdued love, as it is prescribed by good manners and right tone. Twenty-three years old Rembrandt’s self-portraying on the oak panel is fully self-reflective , as are all his self-portraits. Twenty-seven years old Chagall’s self-portrait is joyful and joyfully ceremonial. In 1629, in Leiden, young Rembrandt was discovered by his most important patron Huygens, and started to get commissions from the Dutch state and the country’s ruler. In 1914, young Chagall got his first gallery contract and his first important exhibition. He saw many reasons to create this rembrandt-ish brown with a bit of chagall-ish blue self-portrait, finishing it with that left-side asymmetrical lovelock. In his case, and now in the history of art, it was his lovelock for Rembrandt which accompanied Marc Chagall all his extremely fruitful and productive artistic life”.

Inna Rogatchi (C). Chagall Heritage Today series of essays. (C). 2024-2025.Publication: The Times of Israel -January 2025 https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-lock-of-love-from-chagall-to-rembrandt-and-back/